Weblog

Thursday, 16 July 2009

  • Currently
    Worship by the Book
    By Rev. Mark Ashton, R. Kent Hughes, Timothy J. Keller
    see related

    An Untimely Response...

    My family and I go to a small church. It is really hard to explain why I love this place so much. These people are so amazing, and yet we disagree about so much. There is a real down-to-earth atmosphere of community—and outside of all my journeying looking for existential authenticity, this place really nails a real family spirit. But what I appreciate most is that these people value truth. They actually live, through word and deed, as though there is truth that can be reached. Though we disagree about so much, at least we can have a conversation.

     

    So what do we disagree on? Well, this church believes that you cannot use musical instruments in worship. In fact they call them “mechanical” instruments to highlight their belief that only the voice can make authentic sounds of worship.

     

    So what do you do? How do you engage people who think this about worship? Well, they write articles and such, so why not respond to their articles?

     

    One article that caught my attention was called ‘If a Tree Falls…’ by one of our elders. He is a great guy, and I think he really labors over the consequences of how others muddle truth. In this article he puts forward the logical reason why instruments are not allowed in Christian worship. It is an interesting argument, and has persuded many people (many calvanists still use a form of it).

     

    I wanted to try and level an argument against this notion of singing-only in church—so I responded with an article of my own, which can be downloaded here. or http://www.scribd.com/doc/19916980/An-Untimely-Response-to-if-a-Tree-Falls

    I’d like to get better at arguing and persuading—it is very hard to make any real change in this word. And in the end very few are ever persuaded by arguments like mine—but maybe, just maybe,  it will change me???

Thursday, 26 February 2009

  • If I Don't Go Crazy Tonight...

    Du weist, daß mich nichts mehr als die Music kan laben,

    Denn dieses Element ernehret Seel und Geist.

    Es kan mir in der That kein größrer Dienst geschehen;

    Als wenn ich, wie du selbst davon kanst Zeuge seyn;

    Vom lieben Noten-Volck mich soll umringet sehen;

    Ich räumte, gieng es an, ihm alle Zimmer ein.

     

Wednesday, 25 February 2009

  • Currently
    No Line On The Horizon
    By U2
    see related

    No Line On The Horizon...

    I’ve been listening now to the new U2 album for about a week. It’s really great. I have kind of been fasting music for a while, and so it is nice to break fast with something like this.

     

    So I’m thinking about being judgmental—why do we judge, what is it, and can we live with out it?

     

    I’ve recently had a rather bitter argument with some very close friends and this whole issue of judging has come up as key. It seems to me that we have radically blurred what it means to judge and to be judged. So what is judging? I’d like to suggest that when Jesus says ‘do not judge’ he means that it is not our place to decide who is in and who is out—who is loved and who is hated. However, that being said, it seems obvious that it is our place to judge right from wrong—to judge good from bad based on the standard, the interpretive lens, we see revealed in scripture. In fact it seems impossible to not judge.

     

    If someone does something good what do we say? Do we applaud, encourage, exhort? Yes! This is judgment. This is saying a ‘Yes’ to what we see. Likewise, when we see something that is bad or injurious do we not discourage, dissuade, and content for what is better? This too is judgment—for we are judging something to be bad and/or harmful.

     

    Now my friends have found smoking weed to be something that helps them in life. In the wake of the Vineyard movement they have felt a dryness spiritually and smoking pot has helped to fill in this gap. How? Well, in smoking pot they feel that hey are having ‘God thoughts’ again. They feel that life makes sense and that they can communicate better with others. They don’t want to be narrow-minded and closed to the possibility that this is another useful thing like music or meditation in creating an atmosphere of community and spirituality.

     

    So what happened, how did we fight? Well, it was near Thanksgiving and our families got together for a meal. After the meal as the kids played and the girls talked amongst themselves the guys went outside to smoke. I stayed inside. I have known that they have been smoking pot and I haven’t said anything definitive to them about—again, this is a judgment, even if a suspended one. But then, as the guys were outside smoking pot, the kids wanted to go out to play—and that is when everything went sideways. In the end, without a grounding to talk through this issue, we ended up leaving, to the consternation of others.

     

    Since then I have tried to wrestle with my friends about pot. I have tried to argue that I’m not judging them as individuals but that I do judge what they are doing to be harmful. How is it harmful? Well, my primary concern is that it further splits reality. Those of us who have seen and experienced the highs and lows of spiritual revivals have seen face-to-face the split between subjective and objective reality—even if you didn’t know it. What do I mean? Well, for instance, when my friend says that he is having ‘God thoughts’ what does he mean? If I ask him what these thoughts are why is that he can’t tell me? He just feels he is having good thoughts. But is feeling enough? No one should argue that feelings are bad, but if there is no object for what you are feeling outside of yourself then what is it worth?

     

    I have argued that there is a difference between feeling close to God and not feeling distant—for I think pot can give the illusion of closeness and community. But is it real?

     

    In my opinion we have become dangerously lazy in judging this life rightly. We confuse judging who people are for what they do—we can’t seem to separate the two in our heads. We confuse freedom and openness with grace and goodness, and we confuse setting limits as closed and narrow—as legalistic and judgmental. But real freedom is always bound by real limits. A good judge knows where and what these limits are. Being open isn’t necessarily good. Being free is meaningless unless you are a slave to something—we are to be a slave to Christ, to his ways.

     

    So anyway, after we left the party our friends felt judged by us—which is funny because I felt judged that we were being judgmental. I don’t know how to get out of this. All I know is that I need to be a good friend, to continue arguing for what I believe to be right, delicately and with love and grace—otherwise there is not much I can do. I just want to keep trudging through all this confusion, to find a place of peace and rest, and maybe, just maybe, our kids will have things a bit easier than us.

Thursday, 18 September 2008

  • Currently Reading
    The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism (Cambridge Companions to Philosophy)
    see related

    Argumentum in Nuce

    My family and I now go to a church that radically holds to a ‘traditional’ view of ecclesiology: that is, they hold to a very “plain” interpretation of scripture. This means, among other things, that they do not allow for instruments in church or allow women to take part in the service. I find myself deeply at odd with these views—yet I find it to be a worthy challenge to remain and to argue and to reason with these people who are in every way lovely and good-hearted. In fact, this is probably the first church I visited in years that has any real sense of family—all the others either feel like small bands of rebels, finding their identity in being small, quirky, and fluid; or in being cliquey self-help groups, cloaking their seeker-sensitive programs in a thin veneer of relationality.

    So this past month I have been dismantling and deconstructing in my head this view of no instruments in church—but today my beef has shifted focus to the issue of women. Aside from the question of what this means for my wife—which I trust we answer quite well in how we live our lives together—I wonder how this will affect our daughter. How will she grow up and take all this in? How will she learn to see herself vis-à-vis the church community?

    I have tried to stay abreast of all the debates flying back and forth between the egalitarians and the complementarians—truly I find it all very prosaic. I have, though, found N.T. Wright’s insights to the argument to be helpful, as always.

    http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Women_Service_Church.htm

    The position I currently take is somewhat of a springboard off of N.T. Wright’s. For I agree that we must take the bible as our starting point, that good exegesis takes seriously the local and temporal context of the author and his early readers, that the whole of scriptures must make sense together—but on top of this I want to level a direct ad hominem across the complementarian bow: that though they believe men are to be in authority over women, that they, as pastors and worship leaders, are some of the most feminine of all personae that I've see in all my day-to-day travels.

    Now I mean feminine here, not in the sense that I believe women to be—as different and yet integral to authority—but instead, in the very sense complementarians imply: as being passive and as practically subordinate to the other. In this way I charge most pastors and worship leaders as some of the most passive people out there. Most have great ideas and are great at stirring passion and zeal to this or that ‘task’, but rarely do these men ever do anything actually daring, scary, or engaging. I rarely, if ever, see a truly creative ingenious idea or action. Our songs are nothing but pale reflections of old secular songs. Our preaching is nothing but rehashed speeches from yesteryear's philosophy—recast with that feel-good flavor our contemporary crowd craves. Truly, the church has been led, for the most part, into utter insignificance in face of the greater culture we live within.

    When I start to see blood and guts—martyrdom—or even if I see people get a job and start to move real things, then I'll say let's talk about men and women. Until then I don't want to hear anybody proof-text 1 Timothy and claim 'Thus sayeth the Lord". This over-sexed asexual culture is confusing enough as it is without the odd dimwit claiming the 1950's as some 'golden age'.

    When men lead the church into real conflict, bringing this world to account, and when men lay down their lives for the other, then we can talk about headship!

    I do believe in headship—but I also believe that there is just too much peripheral cultural stuff in the way to even attempt a right view of any man/woman distinction in leadership at this time—so let's get on to something more important. Let's tackle some of these confusing cultural issues.

    fight 

    Art borrowed from: http://www.slapupsidethehead.com

Monday, 15 September 2008

  • Self-Deception

    As I reflect more on Todd Bentley I have come to ask a question about self-deception; how do we get to where we believe we are right, but really we are far from our Father? We know it, but we don’t know it—we see it, yet we don’t see it. The heart of man is a deceitful place—it is not that we need to be perfect, or anywhere close, it is instead that we easily listen to the tiniest of voices and slowly start to drift astray from the only One who gives life. We start to move out from a life in accordance with the voice of God.

    I found this to be all too true again just this past week. I had made a decision some time ago not to play video games—really, life got too busy for them and I slowly stopped—but I found my life was exceedingly better without them, without their distraction and amusement. But this past week I found myself playing them again. Now this might seem like an insignificant thing for those who enjoy games—but for me this is not good. I have spent a lot of time talking about why they are not good, about the dangers of this generation that has grown up in virtual spaces. So why did I start? What happened such that I became a hypocrite? Well I am sure I could recount all sorts of excuses but this just confounds the problem.

    I sinned. I did not listen to the voice of the Lord. I must confess and get back on the right track—it is not okay for me to spend any time playing foolish games. It is hard to admit when you are wrong, but it does feel good knowing there is forgiveness. But that being said, I still wait and watch for new errors, new mistakes—even the pride of admitting my fault. I spend this next week mourning my decision and actions. I am spending my time reflecting on my deceitful heart—a heart that easily listens to other voices than that of my loving Father.

Mokus76

  • Visit Mokus76's Xanga Site
    • Member Since: 2/22/2006

About Me

  • ...I own only two things that I really value - my pipe and my guitar...other than that it's just my family and I and the world revolving under our feet.

Subscriptions